1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
53
54
55
56
57
58
59
60
61
62
63
64
65
66
|
2023-03-12 18:59:46 @mgorny ajak: you're chairing, right?
2023-03-12 18:59:51 @ajak yes
2023-03-12 19:00:28 @ajak so... meeting time!
2023-03-12 19:00:42 @ajak agenda: https://archives.gentoo.org/gentoo-project/message/77c9ceb451349093369cc2e973719da2
2023-03-12 19:00:49 @dilfridge yabba-dabba-dooo
2023-03-12 19:00:59 @sam_ woo
2023-03-12 19:01:14 @ajak 1. Roll call
2023-03-12 19:01:16 * ajak here
2023-03-12 19:01:17 * mattst88 here
2023-03-12 19:01:18 * arthurzam here (as proxy for ulm)
2023-03-12 19:01:25 * sam_ here
2023-03-12 19:01:33 * mgorny here
2023-03-12 19:01:54 * dilfridge here
2023-03-12 19:02:10 @mattst88 gyakovlev is not here (COVID)
2023-03-12 19:02:11 @ajak gyakovlev:
2023-03-12 19:02:14 @ajak oh ok
2023-03-12 19:02:23 @sam_ bless
2023-03-12 19:02:41 @ajak ok, then: 2. Approve update of GLEP 68 [1,2]
2023-03-12 19:03:20 @ajak https://archives.gentoo.org/gentoo-dev/message/79647fad4c28a2f66489f0d8240b527d
2023-03-12 19:03:50 +arthurzam I think this is good idea, only need to update pkgcheck to use EAPI=5 instead of EAPI=0 when checking those restricts
2023-03-12 19:03:52 @sam_ did someone verify portage actually checks this
2023-03-12 19:03:58 @sam_ (and pkgcheck, yeah)
2023-03-12 19:04:12 +arthurzam I added a check for that in last month
2023-03-12 19:05:16 @ajak that would seem to be the only sticking point, not any dissent on the mailing list
2023-03-12 19:05:37 @sam_ it's fine with me anyway to move forward
2023-03-12 19:06:17 @ajak ok, so motion: approve ulm's update to glep 68
2023-03-12 19:06:42 * mattst88 yes
2023-03-12 19:06:44 @sam_ (reason being that I feel like I/nobody else would get to it in portage if you're waiting on us, so best to just get on with it, as I suspect it works anyway)
2023-03-12 19:06:45 * arthurzam yes
2023-03-12 19:06:45 * sam_ yes
2023-03-12 19:06:45 * dilfridge yes
2023-03-12 19:06:46 * ajak yes
2023-03-12 19:06:59 * mgorny yes
2023-03-12 19:07:09 @dilfridge unanimous
2023-03-12 19:07:10 @ajak yay, unanimous
2023-03-12 19:07:36 @ajak moving on: 3. Open bugs with Council participation
2023-03-12 19:07:51 @ajak bug 883715
2023-03-12 19:08:03 @ajak probably blocked on mgorny's update to that glep
2023-03-12 19:08:28 @ajak bug 900857
2023-03-12 19:08:29 willikins ajak: https://bugs.gentoo.org/900857 "Vote on "glep-0076: Relax name policy to allow pseudonyms""; Gentoo Council, unspecified; IN_P; mgorny:council
2023-03-12 19:08:51 @sam_ yeah please vote on that
2023-03-12 19:09:00 @sam_ not here but go do it when you can, ideally now :p
2023-03-12 19:09:39 +arthurzam Just noting for logs that ulm has already voted on bug so as proxy I don't need to do anything
2023-03-12 19:09:49 @dilfridge and we already have a majority there (4 yes)
2023-03-12 19:09:52 @ajak yes
2023-03-12 19:10:01 @ajak i added that bug as a dep for the first one
2023-03-12 19:10:20 @ajak so, that brings us to bug 895728
2023-03-12 19:10:21 willikins ajak: https://bugs.gentoo.org/895728 "GLEP 1, GLEP 2, GLEP 42: Specify that all dates are in the UTC+00:00 time zone"; Documentation, GLEP Changes; IN_P; ulm:glep
2023-03-12 19:10:50 @ajak i suppose if there's no dissent, ulm will proceed with it soon, seems reasonable to me
2023-03-12 19:10:54 @ajak pretty straightforward change
2023-03-12 19:11:03 @dilfridge it makes sense
2023-03-12 19:11:09 @dilfridge at least more than UTC+7.5
2023-03-12 19:11:11 @sam_ yeah
2023-03-12 19:11:45 @mattst88 yeah, makes sense
2023-03-12 19:11:49 +arthurzam Maybe only we need to check if other places are missing this clarification (for future fixes, not current one)
2023-03-12 19:12:07 @ajak right, we can follow up elsewhere as necessary
2023-03-12 19:13:02 @ajak ok, moving on
2023-03-12 19:13:09 @ajak 4. Open floor
2023-03-12 19:14:51 @ajak anything?
2023-03-12 19:15:30 @ajak ok, guess not :)
2023-03-12 19:15:38 * ajak bangs gavel
2023-03-12 19:15:46 @sam_ thank you!
2023-03-12 19:15:48 @ajak all done! thanks all
2023-03-12 19:15:50 @mgorny thanks
2023-03-12 19:15:50 +arthurzam Thank you for chairing
2023-03-12 19:16:02 @dilfridge thank you!
|
GitWeb
