20211010: add summary

Signed-off-by: Michał Górny <mgorny@gentoo.org>

2 files changed, 90 insertions, 0 deletions

diff --git a/meeting-logs/20211010-summary.txt b/meeting-logs/20211010-summary.txt
new file mode 100644
index 0000000..4c71409
--- /dev/null
+++ b/meeting-logs/20211010-summary.txt
@@ -0,0 +1,79 @@
+Summary of Gentoo council meeting 2021-10-10
+
+
+Agenda
+======
+1. Roll call
+2. Operating model of Gentoo project and Gentoo Foundation [1] (from
+last month's agenda)
+3. Open bugs with Council participation [2]
+4. Open floor
+
+
+Roll call
+=========
+Present: dilfridge, gyakovlev, marecki, mgorny, sam, ulm, zlogene
+(proxy for mattst88)
+
+
+Operating model of Gentoo project and Gentoo Foundation
+=======================================================
+Alec Warner (the President of Gentoo Foundation) has asked whether
+the Council is willing to "be the body that decides how to spend
+Gentoo's money".  The Council would advise the Foundation on what to do
+and the Trustees (and later, possibly an umbrella organization) would
+finally approve the expenses.
+
+- Motion: The Council will be responsible for approving Gentoo expenses
+  going forward (with Trustees/umbrella reviewing Council decisions).
+
+  Accepted unanimously.
+
+
+Open bugs with council participation
+====================================
+- Bug 736760 "Application to Software Freedom Conservancy":
+
+  The Council decided to remove itself from the CC, leaving any further
+  action to Trustees.
+
+- Bug 786105 "access to manage projects on GH"
+
+  The Council discussed the request and reached no consensus.
+  Considering that it was submitted just before the meeting,
+  it was decided that it should be discussed on the mailing list first.
+
+- Bug 807193 "virtual/udev: switch to sys-fs/udev as primary provider
+  on musl"
+
+  It has been pointed out that there is no real need for Council
+  decision here.  Nevertheless, the Council voted as requested
+  by the OP.
+
+  Motion: approve switching the default virtual/udev provider
+  to sys-fs/udev
+
+  6 yes, 0 no, 1 abstain -- motion passed.
+
+
+Open floor
+==========
+The state of communication with various umbrellas was shortly
+summarized:
+
+- Software Freedom Conservancy has indicated that we are not a good fit
+  for one another.
+- the communication Software in Public Interest was stalled again.
+- the discussion with Linux Foundation is ongoing and seems positive.
+- Open Source Conservancy is waiting for our decision.
+
+The progress of providing a Gentoo GitLab instance was discussed.
+It was pointed out that an instance is running already but it is not
+being "offered" yet.  It lacks backups, CI, the setup is not final
+and only developers can log in.
+
+
+References
+==========
+[1] https://archives.gentoo.org/gentoo-project/message/2fea68fbd3a193098fd97ddac04a3e3d
+[2] https://wiki.gentoo.org/wiki/Project:Council#Open_bugs_with_Council_participation
diff --git a/meeting-logs/20211010-summary.txt.asc b/meeting-logs/20211010-summary.txt.asc
new file mode 100644
index 0000000..68fd5f6
--- /dev/null
+++ b/meeting-logs/20211010-summary.txt.asc
@@ -0,0 +1,11 @@
+-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
+
+iQEzBAABCAAdFiEEx2qEUJQJjSjMiybFY5ra4jKeJA4FAmFmfa4ACgkQY5ra4jKe
+JA6lAQf+Jd+Rptik8+tz6bptGamgqwQ+03Zr4bpazAT97S0SiWRUk0VPwIHrE/Uj
+IRsy/291uLC60mrE3BvhrO5BpmOL3zQ1OJUXa3Xq0+ZRZW8XVEJykV5qVGJ8Scql
+UjyHAO0ExcCBCQzOdhOAEO1iDrP3v89P5mX2wa/7xmUgOrBrjiojfl0UdehJ3gXB
+rsaRoy6LU4C8LP1Frni3O6k3iu17qc8FzJGSwW7yeEBfzEoA92IzLgekcw0ArWXt
++17Gf+9yY6WoyQHENTGWGofg4RR8mcM2jPlcG6VgEI06gndiIBlVqpraLGohjkH3
+F2PVTrYS/C8HzVK0Aw/GwTGVI3BQ4Q==
+=Y0hz
+-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----