aboutsummaryrefslogtreecommitdiff
path: root/rules
diff options
context:
space:
mode:
authorFranck Bui <fbui@suse.com>2018-02-28 10:36:06 +0100
committerLennart Poettering <lennart@poettering.net>2018-02-28 10:36:06 +0100
commitf8adf25d658a9c3965e2c88d241aefeabf5de601 (patch)
tree3b57e22b0570ee0f68fbcf0864775009131ce33b /rules
parentkernel-install: Don't install BLS kernel images if dest dir doesn't exist (#8... (diff)
downloadsystemd-f8adf25d658a9c3965e2c88d241aefeabf5de601.tar.gz
systemd-f8adf25d658a9c3965e2c88d241aefeabf5de601.tar.bz2
systemd-f8adf25d658a9c3965e2c88d241aefeabf5de601.zip
rules: skip btrfs check if devices are not ready in 64-btrfs.rules (#8304)
If any devices are marked with 'SYSTEMD_READY=0' then we shouldn't run any btrfs check on them. Indeed there's no point in running "btrfs ready" on devices that already have SYSTEMD_READY=0 set. Most probably such devices are members of a higher layer aggregate device such as dm-multipath or software RAID. Doing IO on them wastes time at best, and may cause delays, timeouts, or even hangs at worst (think active-passive multipath or degraded RAID, for example). It was initially reported at: https://bugzilla.opensuse.org/show_bug.cgi?id=872929
Diffstat (limited to 'rules')
-rw-r--r--rules/64-btrfs.rules.in1
1 files changed, 1 insertions, 0 deletions
diff --git a/rules/64-btrfs.rules.in b/rules/64-btrfs.rules.in
index c3a0972f2..aad29afb8 100644
--- a/rules/64-btrfs.rules.in
+++ b/rules/64-btrfs.rules.in
@@ -3,6 +3,7 @@
SUBSYSTEM!="block", GOTO="btrfs_end"
ACTION=="remove", GOTO="btrfs_end"
ENV{ID_FS_TYPE}!="btrfs", GOTO="btrfs_end"
+ENV{SYSTEMD_READY}=="0", GOTO="btrfs_end"
# let the kernel know about this btrfs filesystem, and check if it is complete
IMPORT{builtin}="btrfs ready $devnode"